Case Study: Designing a Decision Support Dashboard for Enterprise Leaders


Context Snapshot

  • Mission: Enable enterprise leaders to quickly identify delivery risks and performance trends in order to take timely action.
  • Environment: Large, regulated enterprise operating across multiple Agile teams and programs.
  • Timebox: ~15 business days
  • Role: UX Lead & Interaction Designer (embedded)
  • Outputs: Decision‑ready dashboard prototype, scalable visualization patterns, documented design guidance

The Decision to Enable

Senior leaders lacked a clear, shared view of Agile health and delivery performance. Data existed, but it lived in dense tables and disconnected reports, making it difficult to answer critical questions:

  • Where are teams struggling right now?
  • Which issues require immediate intervention?
  • Where should leadership focus attention this sprint?

Key Decision: How can leaders move from raw data to actionable insight fast enough to influence outcomes?


Rapid Insight Generation

Rather than starting with exhaustive requirements, I worked directly with executive stakeholders to identify the top decisions they needed to make. I analyzed existing data sources—including Agile metrics, operational reports, and stakeholder workflows—to determine which signals truly mattered.

Within the first 72 hours, I distilled needs into a prioritized set of indicators aligned to leadership questions, not system outputs.


Dashboard Prototyping at Speed

Using Figma and system‑based components, I delivered:

  • Day 2–3: Low‑fidelity concepts exploring multiple visualization approaches
  • Day 4–5: Medium‑fidelity interactive prototype with drill‑down behavior
  • Day 6–7: Decision‑grade prototype refined through leadership feedback

The dashboard translated complex tabular data into clear visual signals, allowing users to scan, compare, and investigate trends within minutes.


Accessibility & Systems by Default

Accessibility and scalability were built in from the start:

  • Color‑safe palettes and non‑color indicators for status
  • Clear labeling and hierarchy for screen‑reader compatibility
  • Reusable visualization patterns aligned to enterprise standards

Design documentation ensured the dashboard could be extended or scaled without rework.


Test → Learn → Adapt

Rapid feedback sessions with executives and product leaders revealed opportunities to simplify views and surface exceptions more clearly. Iterations focused on:

  • Reducing cognitive load
  • Highlighting outliers and trends
  • Improving drill‑down clarity

Each iteration tightened the connection between what leaders saw and what actions they needed to take.


Outcomes & Impact

  • Enabled leaders to identify delivery risks in minutes instead of hours
  • Improved focus on high‑impact issues during sprint and portfolio reviews
  • Reduced follow‑up clarification requests by ~35%, indicating clearer shared understanding
  • Accelerated leadership response to emerging team‑level issues

Scale Readiness

To support broader adoption, I delivered:

  • Modular dashboard components
  • Interaction and visualization guidelines
  • Clear mapping between metrics and decisions

These assets allowed additional teams to extend the dashboard without redesigning from scratch.


Reflection: AI‑First Evolution

Today, I would further accelerate this work by:

  • Using AI to surface anomalies and trends automatically
  • Generating dynamic summaries for leadership review
  • Enabling natural‑language exploration of underlying data

The principle remains consistent: design dashboards to support decisions, not just display data.